Share this:

No Regulatory Exemptions

Demand mandatory GMO safety assessments

 

Updated May 25, 2021

Take action

  1. Use the box on the right of this page to email the Minister of Health.
  2. Health Canada’s consultation on new regulatory guidance for risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) closed on May 25 but you can still send your email to Health Canada: hc.bmh-bdm.sc@canada.ca

Quick Update

 

Health Canada’s consultation closes

May 25, 2021

Health Canada launched a public consultation (March 25 – May24, 2021) on its proposal to remove government oversight for some genetically engineered foods, particularly those produced through the new genetic engineering techniques of genome editing (also called gene editing). These proposals would allow some GMOs (genetically modified organisms) into our food system without any government safety assessments – these would be unregulated GMOs that the government may not even know exist.

CFIA’s consultation begins

May 19, 2021

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has launched a public consultation on proposals on the environmental risk assessment of genetically engineered plants.

Overview

Health Canada held a public consultation on its proposal to remove government regulation of some genetically engineered (genetically modified or GM) foods.

If approved, the proposals would remove government oversight for some genetically engineered foods, allowing some GMOs (genetically modified organisms) into our food system without any government safety assessments – these would be unregulated GMOs that the government may not even know exist. Many of these GMOs are likely to be produced using the new genetic engineering techniques of genome editing, also called gene editing.

Health Canada’s proposals threaten food safety and democracy. Health Canada is proposing to abdicate its responsibility to ensure food safety and set a precedent of corporate self-regulation in the use of genetic engineering in our food system.

Government safety assessments already rely on confidential science submitted by product developers but, if these new proposals go ahead, Health Canada will not even check this corporate science. Allowing corporate self-regulation would be a significant move away from government oversight and review by independent government scientists. Multinational biotechnology and pesticide corporations and their lobby group CropLife Canada have asked for these changes because seed companies want easier, faster regulations for the new genetic engineering techniques of gene editing in particular.

Health Canada is proposing three changes – click here to consult our full Guide or keep reading for a summary:

  1. Allow some genetically engineered foods onto the market without government safety assessments: Health Canada is proposing to exempt some genetically engineered foods from regulation. This means that some GMOs would be allowed onto the market without government safety assessments. Specifically, Health Canada is proposing to allow product developers to assess the safety of their own GMOs if there is no foreign DNA inserted. This proposal overlooks the potential consequences of unintended and unexpected effects created by the process of genetic engineering, genome editing in particular (See CBAN’s report for discussion of the risks of genome editing).
  2. Allow unregulated GMOs to go unreported to the government: Health Canada proposes to set up a “Voluntary Transparency Initiative” that would not require, but would encourage private companies to voluntarily inform the government of any unregulated gene-edited GMOs that companies intend to put on the market.
  3. Conduct weaker safety assessments for GMOs that are similar (“identical”) to previously approved GMOs: Health Canada also wants to relax information requirements for the safety assessments of GM foods that have “identical” GM characteristics to those already approved. This proposal introduces “tiered” assessments that could mean “expediated service standards” (shorter timelines for a risk assessment) for some GMOs. More information and analysis on this proposal is forthcoming. See our comments to Health Canada for more information.

If accepted, these changes would set a critical precedent to allow corporate self-regulation of foods produced by new technologies. In fact, Health Canada’s consultation is the beginning of a multi-year process to “modernize” regulation for all GMOs, including GM seeds and GM animals. 

More information:

Background

What is happening?

Why is it happening?

What is at stake?

  • The role of government and the future of independent science: The public cannot rely on product developers and corporate science to ensure product safety – independent, peer-reviewed science and independent government oversight is essential to safeguarding public health.
  • The role of the public in decision-making: Consumers and farmers should have input into decisions over the use of new technologies in our food system like genetic engineering, including as part of assessing the need to use the technology and the potential social and economic impacts.
  • The future of food and farming: The new genetic engineering techniques of genome editing are powerful and could be used to produce many new patented GM foods, plants and animals.
  • Food safety: Safety assessments of genetically engineered foods must consider potential unexpected impacts of the process of genetic engineering and not just focus on the product and the insertion of foreign DNA.

Decoding Health Canada’s language

  • “Regulatory guidance”: The proposals are not changes to regulations but would change the “guidance” document, which interprets the regulations and instructs regulators on how to assess GMOs for food safety.
  • “Plant breeding”: The biotech industry and Health Canada often refer to the new genetic engineering techniques of gene editing as “breeding” methods but this is not accurate or appropriate. Unlike breeding methods, genetic engineering techniques (including gene editing techniques) intervene directly in the genome to make changes.
  • “Genetic modification”: The term “genetic modification” is commonly used interchangeably with “genetic engineering,” to refer to the new laboratory techniques of directly intervening in the genome of organisms to make changes. However, Health Canada uses the term “genetic modification” to refer to a broad category that includes conventional plant breeding as well as genetic engineering.
  • “Biotechnology”: In the proposals, Health Canada does not use the term “genetic engineering” at all but instead uses the broader term “biotechnology.”
  • “Pre-market notification”: When Health Canada refers to pre-market notification they are referring to the process where product developers submit information on their GMO to regulators for a safety assessment.
  • “Retransformants”: This is not a common term but Health Canada uses it, for the purposes of regulation, to refer to plants that have been genetically engineered with the identical sequence of DNA as a previously-authorized plant of the same or similar species, to create the same GM trait.

Resources

Health Canada has two consultation documents (available upon request from Health Canada from their consultation webpage):

  1. Proposed Changes to Health Canada Guidance on the interpretation of Division 28 of Part B of the Food and Drug Regulations (the Novel Food Regulations): When is a food that was derived from a plant developed through breeding a “novel food”?
  2. Proposed Health Canada Guidance on the pre-market assessment of foods derived from Retransformants under of Division 28 of Part B of the Food and Drug Regulations (the Novel Food Regulations)

CBAN briefings on Health Canada’s proposals:

For information on genome editing (gene editing):

For information on GMO regulation in Canada:

 

See this letter fullscreen

No Regulatory Exemptions

Act Now to stop unregulated GMOs.
Health Canada is proposing to remove regulation from some genetically engineered (genetically modified or GM) foods, and hand regulation over to private companies instead. Tell the Minister you want mandatory, independent safety assessments for all genetically engineered foods and crops. To: The Honourable Patty Hajdu, Minister of Health, CC: Don Davies, NDP; Michelle Rempel Garner, Conservative; Luc Thériault, le Bloc Québécois; Paul Manly, Green Party.

Dear Minister

[signature]

Share this with your friends: